Tim Ferriss

No Biological Free Lunches

“When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the Universe.”
— John Muir

The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, and you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy.
Blade Runner

There are few or no biological free lunches. 

This short post will cover the essentials of how this principle applies to performance-enhancing drugs.

But before we dive in, let’s watch some entertainment that drives the point home…

Growth agents have a place in medicine1, and some sports effectively require them at higher levels. That said, there are risks when you turn the volume to 11 within complex hormonal cascades with equally complex feedback loops. I have some personal experience here. When I long ago had my shoulder completely reconstructed (video here; viewer discretion is advised), a portfolio of anabolic drugs was part of the recovery plan. This wasn’t advised by my surgeon. I found gray-area longevity doctors recommended by world-class athletes, and the cocktail was incredibly effective for regaining full range of motion.

Physical optimization is fundamentally about trade-offs.

And if you ask “Is this risky?,” the follow-up question is sometimes relative: “Risky as compared to what?” In this case, I decided that using these powerful drugs with supervision was an acceptable risk relative to the likelihood of otherwise never regaining full function of my left shoulder.

I did a ton of homework, I budgeted for possible problems, and I didn’t take it lightly.

It’s alarming how many folks now treat “T” or “TRT” (testosterone replacement therapy) as something akin to taking a multivitamin, when they never would have considered taking androgenic-anabolic steroids (AAS) a few years earlier. Like Patagonian toothfish has become Chilean sea bass on fashionable menus worldwide, it’s quite the rebrand story, but that doesn’t change the underlying biology.

It also doesn’t change the underlying “replacement” part of TRT, which applies to many drugs.

If you take something exogenously (originating from outside an organism; think “exo” of exoskeleton) that your body produces endogenously (originating from inside an organism), your body—in its infinite wisdom—will reduce or stop producing said something. Endocrinology abhors waste. This is why many men’s testicles will shrink down to Raisinets when they take supplemental testosterone, and for a decent percentage of those men, the deflated balloons will not return to baseline function without post-cycle therapy (PCT) drugs like Clomid/clomifene and/or hCG. Side note: just as with testosterone, you shouldn’t casually take hCG. Faustian bargains abound if you don’t have a basic grasp of the systems you’re tinkering with.

This also applies to supplements and food. The more technical FDA definition of “drug” highlights a legal distinction, not a pharmacological one. If something’s intended to produce a change in your body, consider it a drug and you’ll make fewer mistakes. This is helpful reframing, whether the input is a prescription drug, illicit drug, peptide, mineral, supplement, or banana.

Separately, many growth agents aren’t hyper-selective (e.g., human growth hormone [HGH], IGF-1), meaning that they don’t just affect one tissue type. If, like some enhanced Major League Baseball players, your head jumps a few helmet sizes, that enlarged cranium won’t shrink when your muscles atrophy after getting off the sauce. Ditto if you unknowingly supersize your liver and spleen. It’s hard to hit undo on Dolph Lundgren jawlines if you’re a woman, it can be tricky to unwind drug-induced breast tissue growth (gynecomastia) if you’re a male, and it’s hard to whisper your organs down a size if you’re a human.

Think very carefully about which doors are two-way doors—reversible—and which are one-way doors. Best to measure twice and cut once.

This is not to say there isn’t a place for TRT. There is. But the use case matters, and the dose makes the poison. If I were 50+ years old and had chronically low testosterone plus symptoms of low testosterone plus I’d been evaluated for possible reversible causes of low T, I might consider TRT to bring me within physiologically normal levels. This is fundamentally different from someone taking supraphysiological doses—amounts greater than normally found in the body—for getting swole like a kangaroo.

This all might seem complicated, but most of what I’m saying boils down to basic logic and a few guidelines. 

I’m not a doctor, and I don’t play one on the Internet, but the below heuristics have helped me avoid a lot of problems with performance-enhancing “drugs,” as broadly defined earlier:

  1. Assume there is no biological free lunch.

  2. Assume that the larger the amplitude of positive effect of *anything*, the larger the amplitude of side effects, whether they are known or unknown. This could apply to modafinil or a high-octane macchiato.

  3. Don’t ask a barber if you need a haircut. If someone is selling the thing you’re considering, or its use has become their identity, expect biased advice.

  4. Replicate before you escalate. This comes back to “measure twice, cut once.” I’ve seen many friends take dramatic steps before replicating their tests. If you booze over the weekend, sleep like garbage, and then do a blood draw later AM on Monday, you might find that—gasp!—you have low testosterone. Before you pull out the big guns, perhaps you should repeat the test on two Wednesdays and do so earlier in the morning, when T will typically be higher. Some evidence also suggests predictable seasonal variations in T levels. Last but not least, labs make mistakes. I recall one well-respected lab for allergy testing returning 100% positive results for black bean allergy to all of their clients for a two-week period. It was a lab error. Before any intervention with possible side effects, replicate.

  5. I routinely cycle off of drugs and supplements I can safely cycle off of for short periods of time. This might be one week every two months and one entire month a year. These are basically intermittent wash-out periods, intended to allow my body to reestablish some homeostasis and feedback loops without a bunch of confounding variables. Put another way, we don’t know what we don’t know, and some medically supervised form of pharma-fasting is an insurance policy. I think about cheap insurance in life a lot. THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO CRITICAL MEDICATIONS, AND YOU SHOULD SPEAK WITH YOUR DOCTOR BEFORE MAKING ANY CHANGES TO YOUR HEALTHCARE REGIMEN. Please don’t win any Darwin Awards.

  6. Know how you could get off of any substance before you get on it. Our understanding of biology is incomplete, so as with any form of gambling, no matter how informed, know your exit plan before you sit down at the table.

  7. Biceps are temporary, baseball helmet sizes are forever.

Choose wisely and play the long game, my friends.

– T

P.S. Sincere thanks to AS, PA, SG, KS, and MN for reading drafts and providing feedback. Of course, any screwups are mine. In timely news, the following came out in Forbes, just as I was about to hit publish: “Billionaire Peter Thiel Backs Doping-Friendly Olympics Rival — What To Know About The ‘Enhanced Games.’” I’ll certainly watch this competition, but truth be told, the doping Olympics already exists, and it’s called the Olympics. Athletes and coaches just have to be champions in two categories simultaneously: their sport and cat-and-mouse drug testing. I suggest the podcasts, documentaries, and books below for a taste of how sophisticated this has become.

Additional resources:

Use of Growth Hormone, IGF-I, and Insulin for Anabolic Purpose: Pharmacological Basis, Methods of Detection, and Adverse Effects

All things testosterone and testosterone replacement therapy by Dr. Peter Attia. (Exclusively for my audience, Peter kindly made this podcast episode—a 2-hour deep dive on testosterone and TRT—available for free. It is normally behind a paywall and part of Dr. Peter Attia’s membership, which offers extensive show notes for every podcast episode, member-only “Ask Me Anything” episodes, premium articles produced by Peter and his dedicated team of world-class research analysts, and much more. Click here to learn more about becoming a member.)

Bigger, Stronger, Faster (Documentary)  

Icarus (Documentary)

Anabolics, 11th Edition by William Llewellyn

Game of Shadows: Barry Bonds, BALCO, and the Steroids Scandal that Rocked Professional Sports by Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams

The World’s Most Famous Performance-Enhancement Chemist (Podcast episode on The Tim Ferriss Show with Patrick Arnold.)

Patrick Arnold, widely considered “the father of prohormones,” is an organic chemist known for introducing androstenedione (remember Mark McGwire?), 1-Androstenediol (marketed as “1-AD”), and methylhexanamine into the dietary supplement market.

He also created the designer steroid tetrahydrogestrinone, best known as THG and “the clear.” THG, along with two other anabolic steroids that Patrick manufactured (best known: norboletone), were not banned at the time of their creation. They were hard-to-detect drugs at the heart of the BALCO professional sports doping scandal, which thrust Barry Bonds and others into the spotlight. BALCO distributed these worldwide to world-class athletes in a wide variety of sports, ranging from track and field to professional baseball and football.

  1. Some types of hypopituitarism, wasting syndromes/diseases, surgical care, etc. ↩︎
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

Comment Rules: Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That's how we're gonna be — cool. Critical is fine, but if you're rude, we'll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation! (Thanks to Brian Oberkirch for the inspiration.)

318 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scotty C
Scotty C
2 years ago

Maybe try icing your balls before jumping on the juice.

Chris Oliver
Chris Oliver
2 years ago

Thank you! I always appreciate your in depth and broad explorations. As well, the provided references.

Travis
Travis
2 years ago

Love this perspective. And the idea of more blogs

BF
BF
2 years ago

No one else can write what you can. It is your clear competitive advantage and words have longevity as a medium. We still read the ancients as far back as we can. If we all live forever I’ll read you forever too! Please keep going.

Eugene Scheepers
Eugene Scheepers
2 years ago

Great post Tim, keep it up! Maybe could be a good idea to do a deep dive on natural ways to boost T. Similar to the podcast Huberman did. Or maybe get him to write a guest blog post?

Dustin
Dustin
2 years ago

I’m in my early 40’s and had T in the lower levels…not technically “low T” but low enough for me to feel like a soft, frumpy butthole. Despite being in decent shape and taking supplements like TA/FA (which did net me ~100 increase), I was barely able to get to an average level. I started low dose TRT to get on the higher side. Not redlining, just above average. It has made a big improvement in my life, both mentally and physically. Did my nuts shrink a little? Yep, and good riddance. Nuts are terrible, plus I already have kids.

That said, I’ve got a great performance/longevity doc here in Austin and get full labs and DEXA done quarterly. So far everything is on point. I remember Andrew Huberman mentioning on one of your podcasts that increased T may have an inverse effect on lifespan. Personally, I accept this trade off. Not in a coke-riddled, plane jumping, wake up in piles of fun naked people way…but a balanced way that validated the therapy. Just adding another perspective to this mix.

Wazza D
Wazza D
2 years ago

Keep Blogging Tim! You are a legend. Your posts are trusted, and better than that, they are useful

Elizabeth
Elizabeth
2 years ago

Great post – entertaining and enlightening. Love the pod, but very much enjoy your writing too. I feel lucky to be able to access your incredible content for free. I’ve learned so much through your books, pod, and blogs.

Mike Stoll
Mike Stoll
2 years ago

Thanks for blogging again, appreciate all you do.

Alaitz Benito Fernandez
Alaitz Benito Fernandez
2 years ago

Thank you for writing. You have an amazing capacity to make any random topic interesting.

Matt
Matt
2 years ago

Glad to see you blogging again. Highly preferred to podcasts. I know the time investment is substantial.

Chris
Chris
2 years ago

Nice article! Coming from 5BF, I have a third path between blog posts yay or nay: could you also read them (and maybe add some additional off-the-script comments to make it more spontaneous and conversational) and release the recordings as podcasts?

Audio has much lower competition for me than reading.

Thanks!

Bart
Bart
2 years ago

Reminds me of a Huberman episode on cannabis I recently listened to. I was a habitual user for the last decade and decided to stop altogether for a year to reestablish a more healthy, less dependent relationship with it. I was so convinced most of the anti-weed stuff I had heard over the years was straight propaganda (because most of it was) that I hadn’t really considered what the negative impacts might be long term.

Boiled down to exactly what you say here, there’s no free lunch and when you mess with an endogenous system, that system gets out of whack.

PS: Love the brief blog post format, short, well researched, and to the point. I read 5 bullet Friday every week and listen to approximately one of your podcasts per year. More writing for me means more Tim content which I’m all for

Hilaire Pierre
Hilaire Pierre
2 years ago

Thanks for the short most. I appreciate the nuanced view ans will definitely play with the cycle off idea to see how i react!

Gunnar Holm
Gunnar Holm
2 years ago

I’m not a pod listener, I’m a reader — please continue writing for us readers.

Jessica Hwang
Jessica Hwang
2 years ago

Even though this topic doesn’t interest me, I still found this so engaging. More please!

Antal Kadas
Antal Kadas
2 years ago

Write!

Liz
Liz
2 years ago

I much prefer blog posts to podcasts. Write more please!

Miro
Miro
2 years ago

Good job. Very nice change to read instead off listening!

Elaisha
Elaisha
2 years ago

Blogs are better <3

Paul
Paul
2 years ago

Great read, thanks Tim.
Informative in an easy to digest format. A very useful alternative to podcasts. A kind of TLDR for a subject you’ve covered on multiple podcasts.
More please.

AHMED ABU ALSAUD
AHMED ABU ALSAUD
2 years ago

YES, MORE POSTS! PLEASE

TBA
TBA
2 years ago

Great article and great heuristics. Thanks for the info

Barbara
Barbara
2 years ago

Thank you for this thoughtful information. Yes to more blogging if you feel so inclined.

William
William
2 years ago

I loved the guidelines. Keep blogging!

Chris
Chris
2 years ago

Yes, it would be great if you could write some more in-depth blog posts like this one. It’s how we got to know you, and it’s been missed (although the podcasts are great as well). Maybe once a quarter would be a good target? I don’t know.

One other thing: the first year you were on Twitter you made a blog post about the 20 or 25 best/most helpful tweets that year. I’m not on Twitter and probably never will be, but I found the list very helpful and used three or four of the recs at the time.

Rachel
Rachel
2 years ago
Reply to  Chris

I like this. I’m also not on twitter (or any social for that matter)

Jen Zeman
Jen Zeman
2 years ago

“Assume that the larger the amplitude of positive effect of *anything*, the larger the amplitude of side effects, whether they are known or unknown. This could apply to modafinil or a high-octane macchiato.” THIS!!! After years of taking Effexor XR 150 mg, and then trying to wean myself off it (unsuccessfully – still take it today), I refuse to take any sort of pharmaceutical that hasn’t been on the market without YEARS of research of its long-term effects (positive and negative), along with knowing what happens when you come off it. At 52, Effexor is me and I am Effexor – there’s no coming off it (unless maybe I spend six months isolated in rehab, but I still wouldn’t come out of there at 100%).

About blogging – I do love seeing you blog again, but recognize the amount of work that goes into it. Podcasts with transcripts work as well for me, but I don’t know if that’s just as time-intensive or not? Maybe blog once in awhile? It’s a nice break (for me) for having to invest a couple of hours to listen to a podcast. This was easier for me to do when I was commuting for work, but now I’m 100% remote and find it difficult to invest that time each day.

Anywho, hope all is well! Thanks for all that you do – we appreciate it!

Anthony
Anthony
2 years ago

More! It is so refreshing to see you back writing Tim. Also, thank you for having the guts to post a rational and balanced view on this. Having your voice out there on this topic, personally, made me reconsider my lazy view on TRT.

b
b
2 years ago

great post, thanks!

Jon
Jon
2 years ago

Seeing more and more turn to this as a first step, great to shed some light on the potential risks here. On another note, awesome to see new writing again – big fan of multiple formats but the blog posts might just be my favorite!

kyle
kyle
2 years ago

keep it up tim!

Amanda Schley
Amanda Schley
2 years ago

I love your blog posts – thanks for writing.

Austin Michael
Austin Michael
2 years ago

Wow Tim I read this twice and then it sunk in, It really is a Tim Feriss blog post. So what you discussed with Noah in Million $ weekend maybe coming to pass, I hope so. Brilliant and please do some more 🙂

Kevin Beach
Kevin Beach
2 years ago

Love the see the old trusty blog up and running. Good points on TRT.

Nate
Nate
2 years ago

Yes! Please keep blogging. It provides better & more reliable reference for complex topics. And I find it more efficient for learning things that “I didn’t know that I didn’t know” – like this blog topic. I’m not into performance supplements – but I find these rules useful for antihistamines, caffeine, ibuprofen, etc.

Alan Johnson
Alan Johnson
2 years ago

Keep blogging

Ben
Ben
2 years ago

I would love to read more of your writing Tim. I read 4HWW in 2007 and been a grateful fan ever since. Thank you for everything that you do, particularly for introducing me to Josh, Naval and Derek Sivers. Profoundly changed my life.

Phillip Sanov
Phillip Sanov
2 years ago

Great blog — thank you! Grateful for your information and links to even more. I’m considering TRT (59, some symptoms), and this comes in very helpful.

– Phil S.

Kasun Kandauda
Kasun Kandauda
2 years ago

Living the blog post, thank you.
And yes, we like the blog

Ingimar Bjarni Sverrisson
Ingimar Bjarni Sverrisson
2 years ago

Excellent read Tim, hope you keep writing here.

John YEVUTA
John YEVUTA
2 years ago

I enjoyed your thoughts. Thanks and keep ’em coming.

Alf
Alf
2 years ago

Thanks Tim

Kelly
Kelly
2 years ago

Love the blog! I’d love to see something on communication from you. You are such a great speaker and writer, would love you tips and tricks. Thank you!

Cody
Cody
2 years ago

Good article highlighting that in life there are always trade offs in everything you do!

Tom Dawson
Tom Dawson
2 years ago

Love the blog. Don’t stop. I’m 78 so suspect it may be an age thing as most younger folks I know hate to read

Matt Lawrence
Matt Lawrence
2 years ago

Tim, I’m gonna need you to pop a few modafinil and crank out some more blog posts. Love the writing. Please keep it up.

Simon Maughan
Simon Maughan
2 years ago

Yes please Tim, more blog posts.

Derek
Derek
2 years ago

Thanks Tim
Good points All 100% true but the way the world is if your normal it’s not good enough. look at every movie and influencers larger then life.
Bigger stronger faster got me more interested not turned off and Mark still killing it.

Erin
Erin
2 years ago

It’s so good to see you blogging again. You’re a gifted and interesting writer that always tackles topics with an in-depth and informative eye. Thank you!

Nicole
Nicole
2 years ago

I appreciate the blog posts. They’re easier to reference relative to podcasts or videos because of their searchability, though I’m not advocating for you to stop podcasting. Length of this was good, and I always appreciate your perspectives on systematizing decisions.

Phil
Phil
2 years ago

Appreciate you blogging again. I have vastly more time to read than listen to podcasts. And appreciate the topic – recently did a lot of research before making a decision on TRT, including reading Llewellyn’s book.

Laurie
Laurie
2 years ago

Some things are better in writing. I like the mix you have going. Great post. Thank you for the sound advice. “Know your exit plan.”

Brandon
Brandon
2 years ago

Great work! Please keep up the blogs!

Philippe Charles DAGA
Philippe Charles DAGA
2 years ago

I love everything you do and I love this as well. Thank you so much Tim for what you bring to me and to the world.

JBay
JBay
2 years ago

Great post

BL
BL
2 years ago

This is so important to unveil. As 46 year old female seeking help for fatigue, weight gain, hair loss and low libido, I found a functional medicine doctor that will insert a testosterone pellet subcutaneously. I’ve been on TRT for almost a year now and my gynecologist lost her mind over the “recklessness” of my functional medicine doctor that put me on testosterone.
I’m so confused now. I felt amazing being on testosterone and she’s freaking out telling me to get off of it and go back on birth control. As a 46 year old woman trying to feel “normal”, we’re left alone trying to find solutions to our premenopausal/menopausal lives that no one has answers for. Peter Attia should investigate this on the female side.
And Tim, you should alway write! I know it’s hard, but you’re really good at it!

CJ
CJ
2 years ago
Reply to  BL

As a 59 yr old woman I have found 3 yrs of bioidentical testosterone and estrogen replacement using pellets a positive life changing experience. I also find frequent level monitoring very important and my dosage has lowered dramatically over the years as my body’s receptors have become resaturated, so very little is needed for me to stay in physiological normal levels. Excessive levels of either hormone do not feel good or normal for me. Given my symptoms I may have benefited starting hormone replacement in my mid-40s and certainly by early 50s. Doing so now has given me my life back.

Tim’s blog is spot on in my experience. Pharma must be used thoughtfully rather than as a mindless magic bullet.

Tim Parker
Tim Parker
2 years ago

Thank you for taking the time to write this. This practice had not appeared on my radar so it’s great to be forewarned. I also found the point you made about taking a break from any supplement to establish homeostasis very useful.

Jack
Jack
2 years ago

Thanks for the insight on biologics. Good idea to cycle the supplements as well.

Mike
Mike
2 years ago

Really appreciate the extra effort these blog posts require. I like that they are less time consuming than the podcasts and easier to find the info I’m most interested in.

Nick Marsh
Nick Marsh
2 years ago

Very wise advice, Tim. As a biologist myself, I could not agree more.

turgut
turgut
2 years ago

yes please, keep blogging, as always, great writing. and thank you.

Shane Hamman
Shane Hamman
2 years ago

Thank you. I read this is and appreciated it. I don’t have time to listen to all the podcasts out there but I am more likely to make the time to read something someone took the time to write.

Brian R
Brian R
2 years ago

well-sourced, well-written, informative, impactful stuff. I’ve never considered TRT for more than a few seconds at a time, but the next time I do I will be better informed for having read this.
I also agree, blogs>>>>>podcasts. I can read a blog post while listening to music, watching soccer… and i don’t suffer from the fact that there is almost no male voice on the planet I don’t get annoyed by if listening continuously for 30+ minutes, let alone 90+, including most especially my own of course.

S S
S S
2 years ago

Prefer blogs over every thing great post

Jared
Jared
2 years ago

Great article! A lot of interesting points.

Please keep blogging when you get the time. I am much more prone to go back and reread something insightful then re-listen to something. And I have reread a number of your blog posts numerous times over the years, they certainly leave an impact!

KK
KK
2 years ago

So informative – and perhaps applicable considerations for ozempic users. No biological free lunches.

Enrique
Enrique
2 years ago

So happy to see you blogging again, and so timely to see this in the midst of the bro-shortcut-supplement-optimisation boom, a nuanced and thoughtful post. Thank you.

Helen
Helen
2 years ago

I appreciate you taking the time to write this. It’s not a subject I was specifically interested in but your style kept me engaged and reading to the end.
I don’t always take in information from podcasts and find it easier to read and digest. Please keep them coming!

TestBoost1-2-3
TestBoost1-2-3
2 years ago

Just dropping by to express appreciation for this and other posts. Love the podcast, but it’s so handy to be able to bookmark a useful blogpost for future reference. Thank you!

David Bradley, MBA
David Bradley, MBA
2 years ago

I think asking for confirmation that there should be blogs will lead to that flood of comments as we see here. Hard to say what the baseline is. The demand for quality written content remains, just as with audio content as “production levels” rise, yet “content depth” remains stagnant (some good sources; a majority self-serving interviews still). So, my hope is for a balance of podcasts and blogs.

My ideal mix is Tim-focused blogs, and keeping experts on the podcasts interviews, with the annual or semi-annual Kevin Rose appearance. The ability to find lesser-known experts like Jerzy is great, despite the popularity of what a Hollywood star might bring.

Matthew Novinger
Matthew Novinger
2 years ago

Thank you, great post.

Carlos
Carlos
2 years ago

Great job. Reading a blog post is a welcome change to listening to a podcast.

Ashley Cordova
Ashley Cordova
2 years ago

Although writing is hard, your writing has a real and lasting impact. Please keep it up!

Tom Fouts
Tom Fouts
2 years ago

Thank-you for all your informative, educational, and thought provoking posts. I do read them. I especially like your “Choose wisely and play the long game.”

Mary
Mary
2 years ago

More blog posts please. With a few tweaks, your seven rules can apply to many things in life. Thanks so much.

Ryan Cooney
Ryan Cooney
2 years ago

Never forget what skill you mastered that got you to this stage – keeping writing/blogging Tim.

Tyler
Tyler
2 years ago

I like blog posts but only end up reading them seldom compared to podcasts. If you recorded your blog posts and posted them as podcast episodes, I would love that.

Roy Horan
Roy Horan
2 years ago

I LOVE your The Tim Ferriss Experiments!!! Blogpost? This one is great, but I am in the middle because I have so much to listen to between you, Rich Roll, Mel Robbins and others plus my other daily readings.

GS
GS
2 years ago

Great write up with easy to apply guidance.

Ben
Ben
2 years ago

Pragmatic and well structured. Thanks for this Tim – always a fan of the blogs

SR
SR
2 years ago

I’m curious why, for you, writing blog posts is harder than podcasting.

Chase Metzger (TF)
Chase Metzger (TF)
2 years ago

Tim, please more blog posts!! You have mastered evergreen content and I like to hear your thoughts on any topic, for real!

Thank you for writing again. It’s more than welcome and I hope to see more!

-Chase

Kevin
Kevin
2 years ago

Hypothetical question for you, Tim.

If there were large, high quality, reproducible, clinical trials that showed that starting exogenous testosterone (testosterone cypionate) around age 35 even in the ABSENCE of deficiency symptoms to achieve serum total testosterone levels at the upper limit of normal (1,000-1,200 ng/dL), significantly reduced one’s risk of developing The Four Horsemen (nod to Pete)….would you do it or agree that is reasonable? (assuming you want to live longer without disease)

In this scenario, one would be managed appropriately by a hormone specialist, mitigating side effects as much as possible (hair loss, acne, infertility, testicular atrophy, blood pressure).

Of course there is no evidence for this nor will there ever be but like you say….”the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence”

I’m clearly biased here but if I’m right, it is a geroprotective molecule when used appropriately. Something to consider.

Paul
Paul
2 years ago

Enjoyed the blog. I am a dedicated listener of your podcast, but reading the printed word enhances my retention.(this old brain needs all the help it can get)

Randy Malone
Randy Malone
2 years ago

Keep writing.

Jorge
Jorge
2 years ago

Tim, I never comment on blog posts except on special circumstances, such as this. Please: more blogs and less podcasts. I used to read every single post you published; now I only listen to one or two of your podcasts out of ten. I still remember some of the core ideas of your best posts; I can’t recall any of your podcast episodes in detail. Written words beat spoken words, hands down. Best. Jorge.

Aaron Carotta
Aaron Carotta
2 years ago

Nice to see a little bit of the balance with the blog post again Tim. Still enjoying the podcast, but one of these every so often feels like a better connection and thoughts from the community in the comments too. Surviving testicular cancer in 2008, some said I made the mistake of never getting my t levels checked now over 15 years later. May still do so but recently found the only time I felt the need to check was when I wasn’t on bodies GOD given journey. Currently on another physical endurance adventure, rowing my boat around the globe. Performance enhancing free at 46, one nut and all. 😁. Love the rules in the post with respect to each their own, in mind. Thanks for taking the effort to write the post, nice to see some long time TF supporters here again too.

John
John
2 years ago

This is a blog post I will keep on my desktop to remind me to question before I leap. And if I leap what is my exit strategy.

Chris
Chris
2 years ago

Really appreciate the writing and thoughtful consideration. With all of the information you have gleaned from experience and friends and interviews, being able to really *synthesize* that into something direct, actionable, useful, and wise is a real skill. Thank you for your work!

Nathan
Nathan
2 years ago

I’d love to see a return to blogging here.

For me podcasts are a complement or supplement to a great blog, not a replacement.

In fact, I’ve noticed that podcasts, on almost any topic, from fun hobbies like BMX, to the pragmatic, practical, or philosophical more easily have a sense of hollowness without some form of complementary blog/media, whether it’s purely text, or written/visual.

But, I’ve noticed the reverse isn’t true for me. If it’s just a blog I may think a podcast would be nice, but it doesn’t feel vapid. I particularly love the blog/podcast combo with the third wheel being YouTube.

Also, I’m glad to see this post on T. My wife and I run a private fitness studio, and we’ve been feeling on alert/alarmed with the push we are seeing for TRT from our local industry peers and exercise adjacent businesses.

Thank you.

Grace
Grace
2 years ago

Thank you Tim – very informative.
I hope you do decide to write a future blog post on associating “cost” with family/friend trips. You mentioned this idea during your walk and talk podcast with Greg M, which was a fantastic listen!

Charles
Charles
2 years ago

Hi Tim – having read and listened for decade+ I’d prefer the podcast. I’m not saying “no blogging” but as you say it’s very time consuming. If you’re worried about “evergreening” the podcast content then maybe working on turning that into more blog-format? But I much prefer the podcast – that type of content/discussion you do extremely well and I don’t know translates well to written word. Plus, selfishly, your podcast allows me to participate while walking, running, etc where reading isn’t an option. Anyway – love your work! Thanks!

Ed
Ed
2 years ago

More blog posts please. Something magical got lost in the transition to podcasts.

Phillip
Phillip
2 years ago

Love the blog posts! I can hardly find time for podcasts these days – there are numerous competing shows, and the 1.5-3 hour episodes that are common in your and many other shows mean getting through an entire episode can take a week if you only listen during commutes.

Blogs, however, I can easily find time to read and review. Because they are written, they become concise – distilling conversations and research into a singular, focused message.

Great article – would love your perspective on why people do steroids, and why for many young people this is a poor answer to addressing body dysmorphia.

Don
Don
2 years ago

Its logical and well written. Im 61 and hope to avoid these, keep lifting and eating right.

ricardo c
ricardo c
2 years ago

Keep writing Tim, miss the blog posts. Much prefer reading to listening!

Attila
Attila
2 years ago

Blog is back, yay!

Roman
Roman
2 years ago

Good stuff! Wish I read this about a year ago!

Valerie Beck
Valerie Beck
2 years ago

Hi! Thank you for the blog post.
As a woman, sometimes I wish I had more functional strength but playing around with hormones with where I draw the line. I’d rather just see how much I can accomplish with natural means and let that be the end of it, but that’s just me.

I love that blog posts are easier to skim through and go back to to look for information, but I honestly listen to your podcast much more than read the blog because of limited time. I’m sure your time is precious too so do what floats your boat!

Thanks for this week’s 5-Bullet Friday. I always love the “what I’m listening to” section. Vivrant Thing is a go-to dance song for some good hip hop sessions.

Leif
Leif
2 years ago

Always love your blog posts. Thanks a million for all the work you do!


Coyote

A card game by Tim Ferriss and Exploding Kittens

COYOTE is an addictive card game of hilarity, high-fives, and havoc! Learn it in minutes, and each game lasts around 10 minutes.

For ages 10 and up (though I’ve seen six-year olds play) and three or more players, think of it as group rock, paper, scissors with many surprise twists, including the ability to sabotage other players. Viral videos of COYOTE have been watched more than 250 million times, and it’s just getting started.

Unleash your trickster spirit with a game that’s simple to learn, hard to master, and delightfully different every time you play. May the wit and wiles be with you!

Keep exploring.