Balaji Srinivasan on Bitcoin, The Great Awokening, Wolf Warrior Diplomacy, Open-Source Ecology, Reputational Civil War, Creating New Cities, and Options for Becoming a Sane but Sovereign Individual (#547)

Illustration via 99designs

“The monopoly of truth is upstream of the monopoly of violence.”

— Balaji Srinivasan

Balaji S. Srinivasan (@balajis) is an angel investor and entrepreneur. Formerly the CTO of Coinbase and general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, he was also the co-founder of (acquired by Coinbase), Counsyl (acquired by Myriad), Teleport (acquired by Topia), and Coin Center.

He was named to the MIT Technology Review’s “Innovators Under 35,” won a Wall Street Journal Innovation Award, and holds a BS/MS/PhD in Electrical Engineering and an MS in Chemical Engineering, all from Stanford University. Balaji also teaches the occasional class at Stanford, including an online MOOC in 2013, which reached 250,000+ students worldwide.

To learn more about Balaji’s most recent project, sign up at, a newsletter that pays you. They’re giving out BTC each day for completing tasks and tutorials. Subscribers also receive chapters from Balaji’s free book, The Network State.

Please enjoy!

Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, Podcast Addict, Pocket Casts, Stitcher, Castbox, Google Podcasts, Amazon Musicor on your favorite podcast platform. You can watch the interview on YouTube here.

Brought to you by Wealthfront automated investing, Eight Sleep’s Pod Pro Cover sleeping solution for dynamic cooling and heating, and BlockFi crypto platform. More on all three below.

The transcript of this episode can be found here. Transcripts of all episodes can be found here.

#547: Balaji Srinivasan on Bitcoin, The Great Awokening, Wolf Warrior Diplomacy, Open-Source Ecology, Reputational Civil War, Creating New Cities, and Options for Becoming a Sane but Sovereign Individual

This episode is brought to you by WealthfrontWealthfront pioneered the automated investing movement, sometimes referred to as ‘robo-advising,’ and they currently oversee $20 billion of assets for their clients. It takes about three minutes to sign up, and then Wealthfront will build you a globally diversified portfolio of ETFs based on your risk appetite and manage it for you at an incredibly low cost. 

Smart investing should not feel like a rollercoaster ride. Let the professionals do the work for you. Go to and open a Wealthfront account today, and you’ll get your first $5,000 managed for free, for lifeWealthfront will automate your investments for the long term. Get started today at

This episode is brought to you by BlockFi! BlockFi is building a bridge between cryptocurrencies and traditional financial and wealth-management products. I became excited enough about this company that I ended up becoming an investor.

Their BlockFi Rewards Visa® Signature Credit Card provides an easy way to earn more Bitcoin because you can earn 3.5% in Bitcoin back on all purchases in your first 3 months and 1.5% forever after, with no annual fee. BlockFi also lets you easily buy or sell cryptocurrencies. For a limited time, you can earn a crypto bonus of $15–$250 in value when you open a new account. Get started today at and use code TIM at sign up.

This episode is brought to you by Eight Sleep! Eight Sleep’s Pod Pro Cover is the easiest and fastest way to sleep at the perfect temperature. It pairs dynamic cooling and heating with biometric tracking to offer the most advanced (and user-friendly) solution on the market. Simply add the Pod Pro Cover to your current mattress and start sleeping as cool as 55°F or as hot as 110°F. It also splits your bed in half, so your partner can choose a totally different temperature.

And now, my dear listeners—that’s you—can get $250 off the Pod Pro Cover. Simply go to or use code TIM at checkout. 

What was your favorite quote or lesson from this episode? Please let me know in the comments.


If this powerhouse episode leaves you thirsting for more, make sure to check out my first conversation with Balaji, in which we discussed the significance of 1729 as a “not boring” number, decentralizing the state of media, achieving financial independence, why “Balaji was right” might be the most terrifying phrase in the English language, a digital native solution to education that qualifies students to work as they go, the power of micro incentives, shifting establishment dynamics, life-extension and transhumanism, woke capital vs. communist capital vs. crypto capital, what a convince-oriented “crypto” government versus a coercion-focused fiat government might look like, the consequences governments trying to ban crypto face, and much (much!) more!

#506: Balaji Srinivasan on The Future of Bitcoin and Ethereum, How to Become Noncancelable, the Path to Personal Freedom and Wealth in a New World, the Changing Landscape of Warfare, and More
  • Connect with Balaji Srinivasan:

Website | Twitter |


  • Why Balaji believes the combination of administrations over the last three decades has blown the biggest lead in human history — and what this illustrates about the decline of state capacity. [07:22]
  • “Asia isn’t really the future, it’s present.”: The forces that guide Balaji’s current worldview, including a comparison of GDP in the East vs. the West over the past 40 years. [12:01]
  • Thoughts on China’s 2021 challenges to the cryptocurrency status quo. [15:24]
  • The Great Awokening, Wolf Warrior diplomacy, and the changing nature of change itself in China. [22:43]
  • “Will the US lose?”: What Balaji foresees as the ripple effects of China’s efforts to solidify its own centralization in a growingly decentralized world, and where India fits into such a world. [32:45]
  • OTC in crypto context and the energy considerations of cryptomining. [43:02]
  • Plausible things Balaji sees happening with crypto in India and the country’s role over the next couple of decades. [49:41]
  • A deeper dive into the woke capital (NYT), communist capital (CCP), and crypto capital (BTC) triangle and how they exercise their power. [51:13]
  • The Russell Conjugation and pondering the meaning of “real” journalism. [1:03:15]
  • Future projections of a Chinese control/American anarchy scenario and what it might look like if the US government tried to seize crypto in order to “protect” the dollar. [1:06:49]
  • Why DeFi (decentralized finance) is able to offer interest rates that make traditional finance laughable, but also how risky it can be. [1:13:07]
  • How cryptocurrency solves the principal-agent problem. [1:15:13]
  • On automation and eliminating human error. [1:21:09]
  • Reluctant sovereignty, the tendency of civilizations to collapse, and other potholes on the road to a utopian decentralized world. [1:29:14]
  • Transhumanism versus anarcho-primitivism and the unbundling and rebundling of society in the Bitcoin Reformation and beyond. [1:41:49]
  • How Balaji sees the counter-decentralization going down differently in China and the US. [1:55:03]
  • What Balaji foresees from the regulatory state’s inevitable collision with crypto. [2:01:26]
  • If Balaji had to live in the United States, what states would be given top consideration, and why? In his estimation, what makes some states more “free” than others? [2:06:33]
  • “Governments aren’t households.” But maybe they can be subscription or inflation models. [2:12:14]
  • What is the DeFi Matrix? [2:27:51]
  • What is NIMBY-YIMBY? [2:34:10]
  • What the current powers that be stand to lose by overregulation. [2:46:15]
  • How a flat coin would work. [2:52:47]
  • Bitcoin: better than gold? [2:55:00]
  • American anarchy, political actors, tensegrity, and San Francisco as a descending world city. [2:57:42]
  • One important lesson learned from COVID: a lot of us don’t have to live where we work anymore — especially if we don’t like it. [3:05:07]
  • The problems with a 51 percent democracy, how the conditions for victory in a modern cold civil war differ from those of 1865. [3:07:24]
  • The coming conflict: centralization versus decentralization. [3:13:13]
  • Has Balaji always said RTed instead of retweeted? [3:20:54]
  • BTC or ETH? [3:21:11]
  • What is the Cantillon Effect? [3:25:26]
  • How do we ensure that the future is governed not by crypto-anarchy, but crypto-civilization? [3:32:49]
  • Where Balaji stands on the idea of secession in a less United States. [3:35:24]
  • Big tech companies in the US on which Balaji is most bullish [3:38:11]
  • On cryptography becoming the new hard truth over once-trusted journalism. [3:40:52]
  • On block explorers as the stealth threat to search. [3:47:16]
  • Why Balaji believes blockchain will make everything more secure in spite of the hacks we’re seeing today. [3:49:28]
  • Social engineering in the anarcho-tyrannical state. [3:53:57]
  • Lawful evil China vs. chaotic evil United States. [3:57:50]
  • On “tech bros” in politics and the unfairness of judicial discretion. [4:00:26]
  • An AUKUS among us and current geopolitical power shifts going on in real-time. [4:04:19]
  • Balaji’s thoughts on angel investing in this part of the 21st century. [4:16:38]
  • The current state of 1729. [4:23:59]
  • Parting thoughts. [4:26:34]


“The monopoly of truth is upstream of the monopoly of violence.”
— Balaji Srinivasan

“Cryptography is hard truth, and corporate journalism has lost control over hard truth.”
— Balaji Srinivasan

“Block explorers are actually the stealth threat to search.”
— Balaji Srinivasan

“Right now we sort of think of companies, currencies, cities, countries, communities as being different things, but they’re all going to become the same thing.”
— Balaji Srinivasan

“The two business models of states in the future will be subscription and inflation.”
— Balaji Srinivasan


The Tim Ferriss Show is one of the most popular podcasts in the world with more than 700 million downloads. It has been selected for "Best of Apple Podcasts" three times, it is often the #1 interview podcast across all of Apple Podcasts, and it's been ranked #1 out of 400,000+ podcasts on many occasions. To listen to any of the past episodes for free, check out this page.

Leave a Reply

Comment Rules: Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re gonna be — cool. Critical is fine, but if you’re rude, we’ll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation! (Thanks to Brian Oberkirch for the inspiration.)

14 Replies to “Balaji Srinivasan on Bitcoin, The Great Awokening, Wolf Warrior Diplomacy, Open-Source Ecology, Reputational Civil War, Creating New Cities, and Options for Becoming a Sane but Sovereign Individual (#547)”

  1. As the first one a super interesting and challenging listen.
    Couple of thoughts: 3:23 it seems like Balaji treats Bitcoin as a “false God” even going back to it’s own mythological origins.
    I can’t reconcile his distributed future from the totalitarian base of the “root” he seems to think it requires: his China or Singapore homerism (not necessarily homerism but discounting mass surveillance/Uygher or cultural destruction). America and it’s leadership is distributed, the rise of states vs federal is further distributed, but we’re to believe freedom/development of a distributed future will be best realized by the root controlled states?
    Crypto civilization as sci fi seems to be the best descriptor: I think about this talk parallel to Disunited Nations by Peter Zeihan. Balaji has no national pride in a place that allowed a construct for his education/wealth, but humans have always been tied to place/proximity/geography/etc. All these things don’t matter in a cryptoverse: so what is left of us as humans/spiritual beings/everything we’ve evolved to be to date?

    1. Good questions.
      When the U.S. dollar (i.e. fiat currency) left the gold standard, it became an abstraction away from the physical realm (i.e. a materially useful thing that must be stored in a place) towards the digital world, where most of our money are just numbers in a database proclaiming who owns it.
      A Bitcoin civilization isn’t a huge leap from that – it’s just decoupled from the fiat part, which is a system of governance based on laws that humans can vote or lobby to change (or appoint new leaders, such as Fed Chairman Powell), where that eligibility is based on some residence status inside physical borders.
      Thus the only thing dissolving or changing in a crypto civilization are the standards for citizenship such that you can shape the rules (or logic) that govern the monetary system.
      In this case, it seems programming knowledge or at least a familiarity with computer algorithms is a basic requirement.

      1. If going from Gold to fiat was a decoupling from the physical reality and going from Fiat to BTC is a decoupling from a false physical reality to a digitized one. Doesn’t any currency still have physical limitations from a resource perspective? In a BCT world we still have to pull physical resources out of the ground and put them into action allocating them to those who need it? From where we are now isn’t Fiat running into major challenges with the resources running out or low? I’ve heard the World economic forum say “in the future you’ll own nothing and be happy about it”. And my thought is who’s version of happy are we talking about? Meaning the only trajectory for Fiat currency to move forward is a form of Totalitarianism. If BTC takes over majority of control doesn’t it still have the same and worsening physical limitations. Making it possibly dead on arrival? We’d just have a new currency but the same totalitarianism outcome?

  2. Hey Tim, would you ever have anyone on that would challenge some of the ideas presented here? There are a lot of smart people out there who have ideas on how to change media who don’t think that the NYT is run by incompetent people who don’t know how to build anything. Or someone who sees the value in crypto understand but also understand the value in Fiat Currency. Finally I know it’s not as much up your ally but maybe a historian focusing on the reasons of the Fall of the Roman Empire who is younger than Gibbons 🙂

  3. This is the first podcast, I haven’t heard one where the discussion has gone almost close towards 5 hrs mark, something incredible. Kudos to the loads of patience of Tim and the overflowing energy of Balaji, so much of subject matter and almost every matter was getting dissected. The depth and diversity of topic, and the relationship between such different subject matter from politics to governace to technology to economy to history to future to investment to startup, you just name it, it was there in the discussion. Deeply insightful and highly intriguing…

    Indeed, there is so much on the aspect of what has happened between US and China, and matters of Asia cannot be discussed by keep India out of picture, the decline of China has to have an equilibrium somewhere else, and it is happening in India. Balaji was so bullish about India, and here are some of the figures to corroborate his analysis.

    India is the top country by listed domestic companies in the world. As of 2020, listed domestic companies in India was 5,215 that accounts for 13.63% of the world’s listed domestic companies. India is the third in the list of countries having the most unicorns, trailing the US (396) and China (277). India had about 50,000 startups; around 8,900 – 9,300 of these are technology-led startups whereas, 1300 new tech startups were born in 2019 alone, implying there are 2-3 tech startups born every day…

  4. Balaji is a
    super unique thinker and I don’t always agree but his ideas are the
    kind of heterodox thinking we need to keep innovative solutions at the
    forefront of people’s minds. His mindset reminds me of how Bret
    Kugelmass talks about nuclear. Would love to see a conversation with
    both of them sometime.

  5. “Never, before, in the course of Ferriss Podcasting, has one man, made me feel so stupid !!!”

    As always just brilliant

  6. I am 77 years old, retired, but read widely. This was an excellent podcast and I am going through the copious show notes with much interest. Thank you so much for providing such viewpoints to those of us who are trying to figure out the world and politics of today. Now more makes sense to me!

  7. Oh, made it (I hang in there) through the 5 hours at Sam Harris’ some time ago.
    This man is no doubt smart and has some ideas, but very tiresome, big ego, doesn’t listen and doesn’t capture the nuances of things. There is a lot more to life.

  8. Wow epic, so many thought provoking topics and resources to explore. Thanks Balaji, Thanks Tim, especially for going to the trouble of documenting all of the resources.

  9. I listened several times to this podcast as well as the one from March. Lots of good thoughts that have changed my perspective on the current state of affairs in the US.

    One thing that came across is that Balaji equates capitalism to free market and indirectly to the decentralization.
    As far as I remember, capitalism is the opposite of decentralization: it is actually accumulation of the capital. Winner takes it all, if you will. Think of the major tech companies mentioned in the podcast.

    As far as markets are concerned, Chinees bureaucracy has been creating and running markets in China close to thousand years. Markets have to be created and maintained, just like crypto market.

    The talk about mythical beginnings of BTC, and disappearance of its creator sounded like pages from a manga book.

  10. Interesting and annoying. A spaghetti code of a conversation. Constant execution of subroutines without returning to the original flow of execution. Definitely some worthwhile concepts. But please, just answer at least one question without descending into more topics with more questions that never really get answered. At least, that’s how it felt to me.

    1. Brilliant guy, for sure. Many epiphanies while listening. Among so many insights, one thing that’s confusing me is Balaji’s assumption that a higher sovereignty (decentralization) of cities and states would create better entities by spurring competition between them for citizens. He compares this to the state of internet-era media, where many subpar journalism outlets die off, leaving only those that provide better value (implied). At the same time, however, he decries that same media — especially in it’s current state, where only those outlets who have outcompeted the others for eyeballs survive — for having a potentially devastating amount of power over the truth, and for manipulating that truth for their own interests (the top interest being gaining more eyeballs, regardless of whether or not what they provide is in the best interest of the owners of those eyeballs). So is he saying that concentration of the most popular ideas (in cities or in media outlets) would create the best possible outcomes or devastating outcomes? He seems to simultaneously argue for both.